header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
14 June 2024 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8075 / Categories: Features , In Court , Human rights , Education
printer mail-detail

Prayer time prohibition

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
177053
Nicholas Dobson considers the key issues in the Michaela Community School prayer dispute
  • It was not unlawful for the Michaela Community Schools Trust to prohibit pupils from performing prayer rituals on its premises.

According to Ofsted, Michaela Community School (a secular secondary free school for boys and girls in Wembley, London Borough of Brent) is outstanding. A school where: ‘Staff are driven by a shared commitment to giving pupils an excellent education, pupils rise to the challenges set by leaders and take their education seriously.’ Ofsted also found the school to be ‘very well led and managed’, with pupil behaviour exemplary and academic results exceptionally good.

The school was founded in 2014 by its headteacher, Katharine Birbalsingh, who estimates that 90% of its pupils are from ethnic minority backgrounds. And while half of the pupils are Muslim, the school also has large numbers of Sikh, Hindu and Christian pupils, broadly in line with the demographic profile of the school’s catchment area.

According to Birbalsingh, ‘a great part of the school’s success

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll