header-logo header-logo

24 January 2025 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8101 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Pre-nuptial agreements: where are we now?

204790
To what extent are pre-nuptial agreements now recognised under English law? Mark Pawlowski weighs up the latest decisions
  • This article considers the court’s approach to pre-nuptial agreements and reviews the case law focusing on both decisions where the agreement has been upheld, and those where (for a variety of reasons) it has not been enforced.
  • It also examines the court’s approach to foreign pre-nuptial agreements entered into by the parties who subsequently seek divorce in the English courts.

A growing number of cases decided since the Supreme Court ruling in Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 have highlighted that pre-nuptial agreements are no longer regarded as contrary to public policy under English law. Our courts will now enforce such agreements, provided certain safeguards are met.

The effect, where such agreements are upheld, is to limit or preclude the parties from relying on the court’s discretionary jurisdiction under s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) in determining the proper distribution of family assets on divorce.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll