header-logo header-logo

24 January 2025 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8101 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Pre-nuptial agreements: where are we now?

204790
To what extent are pre-nuptial agreements now recognised under English law? Mark Pawlowski weighs up the latest decisions
  • This article considers the court’s approach to pre-nuptial agreements and reviews the case law focusing on both decisions where the agreement has been upheld, and those where (for a variety of reasons) it has not been enforced.
  • It also examines the court’s approach to foreign pre-nuptial agreements entered into by the parties who subsequently seek divorce in the English courts.

A growing number of cases decided since the Supreme Court ruling in Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 have highlighted that pre-nuptial agreements are no longer regarded as contrary to public policy under English law. Our courts will now enforce such agreements, provided certain safeguards are met.

The effect, where such agreements are upheld, is to limit or preclude the parties from relying on the court’s discretionary jurisdiction under s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) in determining the proper distribution of family assets on divorce.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll