header-logo header-logo

24 January 2025 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8101 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Pre-nuptial agreements: where are we now?

204790
To what extent are pre-nuptial agreements now recognised under English law? Mark Pawlowski weighs up the latest decisions
  • This article considers the court’s approach to pre-nuptial agreements and reviews the case law focusing on both decisions where the agreement has been upheld, and those where (for a variety of reasons) it has not been enforced.
  • It also examines the court’s approach to foreign pre-nuptial agreements entered into by the parties who subsequently seek divorce in the English courts.

A growing number of cases decided since the Supreme Court ruling in Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 have highlighted that pre-nuptial agreements are no longer regarded as contrary to public policy under English law. Our courts will now enforce such agreements, provided certain safeguards are met.

The effect, where such agreements are upheld, is to limit or preclude the parties from relying on the court’s discretionary jurisdiction under s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) in determining the proper distribution of family assets on divorce.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll