header-logo header-logo

Predicting the (civil litigation) road ahead

22 November 2019 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7865 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
11892
Significant changes are in the pipeline & lawyers need to be aware of what is planned. Dominic Regan puts down some markers

The civil reform process is not over. Intriguingly, the one reform that has attracted the most publicity seems unlikely to be implemented in the near future. The last government legislated for personal injury reforms designed to stifle lower value road traffic claims in particular. April 2020 was definitely going to be the date of implementation. Since fundamentals such as a new Protocol and precise Rules have yet to be addressed, April looks preposterous. As and when the reforms are implemented, the bottom will drop out of lower value claims which up to now have provided bread and butter work for solicitors and the Bar. Sir Rupert Jackson cut his teeth doing cases where the defendant failed to stop, steer or otherwise avoid a collision.

The major change coming is the extension of fixed costs. Everything up to £25,000 will be captured, as will the majority of claims worth from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll