header-logo header-logo

Pressure on as backlog reaches court

10 June 2020
Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
Call for more investment to cope with flood of cases
The courts will be hit by a flood of cases as the lockdown eases, lawyers have warned.

HM Courts & Tribunals opened a further 16 civil and criminal courts this week, adding to the nine that opened in the past few weeks and the 159 that have remained open throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. This represents 54% of the 341 court and tribunals buildings in England & Wales.

A judicial working group is also investigating suitable venues for ‘Nightingale’ courts, which would be temporarily housed in large buildings where social distancing is possible, for example, civic centres or university spaces.

Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, said: ‘Reopening all of the court estate, using additional accommodation and continuing to use technology imaginatively will enable us to return to and surpass pre-lockdown volumes, helping manage the growing caseload.’

However, Criminal Bar Association chair Caroline Goodwin QC said about 40,000 criminal cases are outstanding and this number is likely to rise to 51,000 by the end of June.

In this week’s Monday message, she warns the need to reduce the court backlog, along with the increased police force, means the courts will have to run at 125% of 2019/20 levels for the next three years in order to cope with demand. She called for more investment in the criminal justice system, and warned that more buildings are needed from which to run trials.

‘The backlog is on the increase and we have a toxic scenario where the strain on the court system as we know it is going to literally cripple us and unless something is done it is only going to get worse,’ she said.

‘The physical capacity of the court estate to handle the blindingly obvious, is simply not enough. I might add that this existed before Corona.’

Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll