header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011 / James Langford
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Prevention is better than cure

James Langford emphasises the importance of robust contracts

The problems that can occur when employees seek to exploit knowledge, information, and opportunities obtained during the course of their employment for their own financial gain are highlighted in the recent case of Aerostar Maintenance International Ltd v Wilson [2010] EWHC 2032 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 364 (Jul).

The case involved a company director (D) who was also an employee of the first claimant company, Aerostar Maintenance International Limited (Aerostar). Although several heads of claim against a number of individuals were involved, this article is confined to a discussion of Aerostar’s claim against D for breach of fiduciary duty.

D had been involved in the negotiation of contracts on behalf of Aerostar. It was alleged that D diverted from Aerostar to a newly formed company, a business opportunity that belonged to Aerostar. Although Aerostar did not ultimately establish its entitlement to the sums claimed, it was successful in part. D accepted that he owed Aerostar a fiduciary duty as a director and that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll