header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011 / James Langford
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Prevention is better than cure

James Langford emphasises the importance of robust contracts

The problems that can occur when employees seek to exploit knowledge, information, and opportunities obtained during the course of their employment for their own financial gain are highlighted in the recent case of Aerostar Maintenance International Ltd v Wilson [2010] EWHC 2032 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 364 (Jul).

The case involved a company director (D) who was also an employee of the first claimant company, Aerostar Maintenance International Limited (Aerostar). Although several heads of claim against a number of individuals were involved, this article is confined to a discussion of Aerostar’s claim against D for breach of fiduciary duty.

D had been involved in the negotiation of contracts on behalf of Aerostar. It was alleged that D diverted from Aerostar to a newly formed company, a business opportunity that belonged to Aerostar. Although Aerostar did not ultimately establish its entitlement to the sums claimed, it was successful in part. D accepted that he owed Aerostar a fiduciary duty as a director and that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll