header-logo header-logo

02 October 2014
Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Price fix

On an order for sale of property, is it appropriate that there be provision for the sale price to be determined by the party in favour of whom the order has been made or marketing estate agents instructed by that party or should provision be made for the court to have an input on the price in default of agreement?

This is a discretionary matter which falls to be decided on the circumstances of the case. Where, for example, the order for sale is based on a pre-existing right such as under a mortgage deed and there is a recognised rule governing the duty of the seller to fix the price, the order could follow the rule. In matrimonial proceedings and with an order for sale following a charging order (where the chargee’s debt is often minute compared to the value of the property), it is best practice to provide for recourse to the court in the event of disagreement. However, whatever the circumstances, the order suggested by the questioner is too imprecise as to the duty on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll