header-logo header-logo

Price-fixing plot

24 September 2009
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-detail

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has issued fines to 103 construction firms after they were found to have colluded with competitors to fix the price of building contracts.

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has issued fines to 103 construction firms after they were found to have colluded with competitors to fix the price of building contracts.

The OFT investigation into the activities of building firms under the Competition Act 2006 found that firms had been involved in rigging 199 tenders between 2000 and 2006 through the practice of “cover pricing”.

That activity involves one or more bidders in the tender process receiving artificially high prices from a competitor. These bids are then submitted, not with the intention of winning the bid but rather to distort the true picture of competition.

The OFT imposed a total of £129.5m in fines. Eighty-six of the 103 firms involved admitted their involvement prior to the announcement and received reductions of their penalties of up to 65%.

The investigation involved some of the most well-known construction firms in the UK. The investigation, which focused primarily on the East Midlands, Yorkshire and Humberside regions, resulted in a £17.9m fine for Kier Group plc. Interserve was fined £11.6m while 11 further companies were fined more than £5m each.

Stephen Ratcliffe, director of the UK Contractors Group, said that the fines could not have come at a worse time for the construction industry and warned that firms may find it difficult to absorb the fines.

“Everybody knows—including the OFT—that cover pricing was widespread in the industry in the past. It is perverse and unfair to impose such disproportionate penalties on a small number of contractors selected by geographical sampling,” he said.

Ratcliffe added that the infringements that the OFT investigated were historic and “do not reflect practices in today’s market”.

Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
back-to-top-scroll