header-logo header-logo

24 September 2009
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-detail

Price-fixing plot

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has issued fines to 103 construction firms after they were found to have colluded with competitors to fix the price of building contracts.

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has issued fines to 103 construction firms after they were found to have colluded with competitors to fix the price of building contracts.

The OFT investigation into the activities of building firms under the Competition Act 2006 found that firms had been involved in rigging 199 tenders between 2000 and 2006 through the practice of “cover pricing”.

That activity involves one or more bidders in the tender process receiving artificially high prices from a competitor. These bids are then submitted, not with the intention of winning the bid but rather to distort the true picture of competition.

The OFT imposed a total of £129.5m in fines. Eighty-six of the 103 firms involved admitted their involvement prior to the announcement and received reductions of their penalties of up to 65%.

The investigation involved some of the most well-known construction firms in the UK. The investigation, which focused primarily on the East Midlands, Yorkshire and Humberside regions, resulted in a £17.9m fine for Kier Group plc. Interserve was fined £11.6m while 11 further companies were fined more than £5m each.

Stephen Ratcliffe, director of the UK Contractors Group, said that the fines could not have come at a worse time for the construction industry and warned that firms may find it difficult to absorb the fines.

“Everybody knows—including the OFT—that cover pricing was widespread in the industry in the past. It is perverse and unfair to impose such disproportionate penalties on a small number of contractors selected by geographical sampling,” he said.

Ratcliffe added that the infringements that the OFT investigated were historic and “do not reflect practices in today’s market”.

Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll