header-logo header-logo

24 September 2009
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-detail

Price-fixing plot

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has issued fines to 103 construction firms after they were found to have colluded with competitors to fix the price of building contracts.

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has issued fines to 103 construction firms after they were found to have colluded with competitors to fix the price of building contracts.

The OFT investigation into the activities of building firms under the Competition Act 2006 found that firms had been involved in rigging 199 tenders between 2000 and 2006 through the practice of “cover pricing”.

That activity involves one or more bidders in the tender process receiving artificially high prices from a competitor. These bids are then submitted, not with the intention of winning the bid but rather to distort the true picture of competition.

The OFT imposed a total of £129.5m in fines. Eighty-six of the 103 firms involved admitted their involvement prior to the announcement and received reductions of their penalties of up to 65%.

The investigation involved some of the most well-known construction firms in the UK. The investigation, which focused primarily on the East Midlands, Yorkshire and Humberside regions, resulted in a £17.9m fine for Kier Group plc. Interserve was fined £11.6m while 11 further companies were fined more than £5m each.

Stephen Ratcliffe, director of the UK Contractors Group, said that the fines could not have come at a worse time for the construction industry and warned that firms may find it difficult to absorb the fines.

“Everybody knows—including the OFT—that cover pricing was widespread in the industry in the past. It is perverse and unfair to impose such disproportionate penalties on a small number of contractors selected by geographical sampling,” he said.

Ratcliffe added that the infringements that the OFT investigated were historic and “do not reflect practices in today’s market”.

Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll