header-logo header-logo

06 November 2008
Issue: 7344 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Pride comes before a fall

Attention to detail can prevent a bruised ego, says Rachel Watkin

Landlords are reminded by the recent case of Leonora Investment Company Limited v Mott McDonald Limited (2008) EWCA Civ 857 of the importance of ensuring that procedures set out in a lease are followed to the letter and not to be too proud if they find that they have proceeded incorrectly. The case also acts as a reminder to tenants who may find it financially beneficial to be aware of the terms of their lease, as even if the payments are due under the contract, if the correct procedure for demand is not followed, no duty to pay service charges may arise.

In Leonora v Mott McDonald, failure to follow the procedures set down in the lease led to the landlord being unable to recover the sum of £263,117. The case concerned a 13 story office block in Croydon. The ground, first, second and third floors of the building were let to Mott Macdonald Limited for a terms of 10 years by four

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll