header-logo header-logo

Prisons and Courts Bill dropped

21 April 2017
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The government has dropped the Prisons and Courts Bill, owing to lack of time in the run-up to the General Election on 8 June.

MPs on the Bill Committee this week voted to abandon the controversial Bill, which would have paved the way for online courts, introduced tariffs for whiplash claims, banned settlement of soft tissue injury claims without a doctor’s opinion, reformed prisons and introduced safeguards to protect domestic violence victims being cross-examined by abusive partners in the family courts.

Qamar Anwar, managing director of First4Lawyers, says: 'The news that the Prisons & Courts Bill has been dropped ahead of the election gives the personal injury industry breathing space but nobody should be celebrating.

'There is every chance that a victorious Conservative government would seek to resurrect the reforms in Pt 5 of the Bill. So now it not the time to sit back and relax—the claimant sector needs to work together and keep fighting the myths peddled by the insurers about fraud and the so-called compensation culture.'

However, Huw Evans, director general of the Association of British insurers (ABI), said: 'We did not expect the Bill to be pushed through before the election and are pleased it hasn’t as this would have removed the main opportunity to get a fair reform of the discount rate.

'Aspects of the whiplash provisions were also unsatisfactory, so it is better these didn’t make it onto the statute book unresolved. The task now is to win the argument for both issues to be dealt with as a priority in the new Parliament so there are no major delays to much needed reform.

'Issues like the increased cost of insurance for motorists and businesses and the £6bn bill for the NHS are not going to go away, so the incentives for a new government to act promptly are there.'

Law Society president Robert Bourns said urged the new government elected in June to 'make an absolute priority in re-introducing the proposals providing protection for victims of domestic violence from being cross-examined by their abusers in the family court'.

Issue: 7743 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll