Private act, public function?

Neil Parpworth considers whether electing a new party leader is a public law function for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998?

In Tortoise Media Ltd, the Court of Appeal ruled that electing a party leader—even one who becomes prime minister—is a private act, not a public function under the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998), despite its significant public consequences.
The Conservative Party was not deemed a ‘public authority’ under s 6 of HRA 1998, so it had no legal obligation to disclose internal leadership election data, even when challenged under Art 10 of the ECHR. But judicial review is still possible.

Section 6(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) lies at the heart of human rights protection in English law by making it ‘unlawful for a public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right’. This begs the question: what is a ‘public authority’ for the purposes of HRA 1998? The answer, however, is less straightforward than in some other

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Private act, public function?

Issue: 8124 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights

Neil Parpworth considers whether electing a new party leader is a public law function for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998?

In Tortoise Media Ltd, the Court of Appeal ruled that electing a party leader—even one who becomes prime minister—is a private act, not a public function under the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998), despite its significant public consequences.
The Conservative Party was not deemed a ‘public authority’ under s 6 of HRA 1998, so it had no legal obligation to disclose internal leadership election data, even when challenged under Art 10 of the ECHR. But judicial review is still possible.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Reframing family dispute resolution

As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes

NLJ this week: Employment law updates on restraints, representation & tribunal boundaries

A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike

NLJ this week Civil way: Practical procedure lessons & cautionary tales

From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

NLJ this week: Fraud in the digital age

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

NLJ this week: Right outcome, troubling reasoning?

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct?

Error message

Private act, public function?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay