header-logo header-logo

Private eye

11 August 2011 / Tom Morrison
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

I mentioned in my first column that one of the consequences of a public authority complying with a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000) can be that the media acquires some embarrassing information (NLJ, 20 May 2011, p 698). In the months that have followed it has been certain media outlets themselves that have suffered the consequences of disclosure as new revelations concerning inappropriate use of private investigators have come to light. Whilst some of the recent detail is disturbing, the fact of newspapers using private investigators to uncover information is not new. Neither is the fact that some of the methods used by those private investigators have been questionable at best.

Operation Motorman

Following an investigation code-named Operation Motorman the then information commissioner, Richard Thomas, highlighted the issues in his 2006 reports to Parliament What Price Privacy and What Price Privacy Now?. One of his aims was to expose the illicit trade in personal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll