header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011 / Tom Morrison
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Private eye

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

I mentioned in my first column that one of the consequences of a public authority complying with a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000) can be that the media acquires some embarrassing information (NLJ, 20 May 2011, p 698). In the months that have followed it has been certain media outlets themselves that have suffered the consequences of disclosure as new revelations concerning inappropriate use of private investigators have come to light. Whilst some of the recent detail is disturbing, the fact of newspapers using private investigators to uncover information is not new. Neither is the fact that some of the methods used by those private investigators have been questionable at best.

Operation Motorman

Following an investigation code-named Operation Motorman the then information commissioner, Richard Thomas, highlighted the issues in his 2006 reports to Parliament What Price Privacy and What Price Privacy Now?. One of his aims was to expose the illicit trade in personal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll