header-logo header-logo

09 January 2015 / Tom Morrison
Issue: 7635 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Private eye

morrison_0

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

2015 is a year for anniversaries. A ridiculous comment perhaps as by their nature all years are a year for anniversaries. What I mean is that as we start a new year having just celebrated the 30th anniversary of England and Wales’ first—albeit largely irrelevant—Data Protection Act, we are now commemorating 10 years of the full force of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000). I have not got my dates wrong; it took five years to implement. This ground-breaking piece of legislation was far from irrelevant—how can anything described by a former Prime Minister as one of his biggest mistakes be irrelevant—and it marked a new era for the right of the public to know more about the decisions public authorities make in all our names.

March also represents the fifteenth anniversary of our first genuinely meaningful piece of data protection legislation—the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998—which took nearly two years to be activated). DPA 1998 was a watershed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll