header-logo header-logo

09 January 2015 / Tom Morrison
Issue: 7635 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Private eye

morrison_0

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

2015 is a year for anniversaries. A ridiculous comment perhaps as by their nature all years are a year for anniversaries. What I mean is that as we start a new year having just celebrated the 30th anniversary of England and Wales’ first—albeit largely irrelevant—Data Protection Act, we are now commemorating 10 years of the full force of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000). I have not got my dates wrong; it took five years to implement. This ground-breaking piece of legislation was far from irrelevant—how can anything described by a former Prime Minister as one of his biggest mistakes be irrelevant—and it marked a new era for the right of the public to know more about the decisions public authorities make in all our names.

March also represents the fifteenth anniversary of our first genuinely meaningful piece of data protection legislation—the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998—which took nearly two years to be activated). DPA 1998 was a watershed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll