header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012 / Tom Morrison
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Private eye

istock_000010982433medium_4

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has again made clear that it is not optional to encrypt personal data held on any portable storage device. Nevertheless, many businesses, charities and public sector organisations are either deliberately or unwittingly allowing the continued use of unencrypted devices. It would be a bit of a pun to say that encryption is key to data security, but it has for some time been clear that it is likely that you will be found to be in breach of principle seven of the Data Protection Act 1998 if you lose an unencrypted device containing personal data. Unfortunately, Greater Manchester Police (GMP) was reminded of that by finding itself on the wrong end of a £150,000 fine.

Based on the reported facts, it was a bit of a slam dunk for the ICO. A drugs squad detective took a memory stick home and kept it safe in his wallet. Sadly, his home was broken into and his wallet—along with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll