header-logo header-logo

Private eye

23 November 2012 / Tom Morrison
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail
istock_000010982433medium_4

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has again made clear that it is not optional to encrypt personal data held on any portable storage device. Nevertheless, many businesses, charities and public sector organisations are either deliberately or unwittingly allowing the continued use of unencrypted devices. It would be a bit of a pun to say that encryption is key to data security, but it has for some time been clear that it is likely that you will be found to be in breach of principle seven of the Data Protection Act 1998 if you lose an unencrypted device containing personal data. Unfortunately, Greater Manchester Police (GMP) was reminded of that by finding itself on the wrong end of a £150,000 fine.

Based on the reported facts, it was a bit of a slam dunk for the ICO. A drugs squad detective took a memory stick home and kept it safe in his wallet. Sadly, his home was broken into and his wallet—along with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll