header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 November 2013 / Tom Morrison
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Private eye

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Tom Morrison catches up on key developments in data protection & freedom of information

Freedom of information and data protection interact in complex ways, most commonly in connection with requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000) which could constitute personal data under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998). Sometimes public authorities get the assessment wrong, in the eyes of the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), and purposely withhold information when it should have been disclosed or vice versa. In a case involving Islington Council, however, personal information relating to 2,375 residents was mistakenly disclosed in spreadsheets released under FIA 2000. That mistake cost the council a £70,000 fine. It had intended to release only the summarised information collated from the pivot tables behind the spreadsheets, not the source data.

By contrast the Home Office, Sussex Police and South Tyneside Council are now being intensively monitored by the ICO, following a series of complaints relating to the failure of the authorities to reply to information requests on time. A previous exercise,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll