header-logo header-logo

22 November 2013 / Tom Morrison
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Private eye

Tom Morrison catches up on key developments in data protection & freedom of information

Freedom of information and data protection interact in complex ways, most commonly in connection with requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000) which could constitute personal data under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998). Sometimes public authorities get the assessment wrong, in the eyes of the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), and purposely withhold information when it should have been disclosed or vice versa. In a case involving Islington Council, however, personal information relating to 2,375 residents was mistakenly disclosed in spreadsheets released under FIA 2000. That mistake cost the council a £70,000 fine. It had intended to release only the summarised information collated from the pivot tables behind the spreadsheets, not the source data.

By contrast the Home Office, Sussex Police and South Tyneside Council are now being intensively monitored by the ICO, following a series of complaints relating to the failure of the authorities to reply to information requests on time. A previous exercise,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll