header-logo header-logo

Private schools fail public benefit test

16 July 2009
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Charities

Two out of five test case fee-charging schools have failed to fulfil the Charity Commission’s public benefit requirements.

Last October, the Commission selected five fee-charging schools, four religious charities and three care homes for its first public benefit assessments. This followed the enactment of the Charities Act 2006, which removed the legal presumption of public benefit in favour of charities in the fields of education, religion and poverty.

There is now an active duty on all charities to demonstrate that they fulfil the public benefit requirements.

The results of the assessments, announced this week, revealed that St Anselm’s School Trust, Highfield Priory School and Penylan House Jewish Retirement and Nursing Home failed to satisfy the Commission that the opportunity to benefit was not unreasonably restricted by a person’s ability to pay the fees charged.

The two schools were found to have failed because they did not provide sufficient bursary funding for pupils from poorer backgrounds.
One of three test case care homes also failed, while another care home was deemed to be acting outside its charitable objects.

The commission will now work with these charities over the next 12 months to look at how they might make the necessary changes.

Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll