header-logo header-logo

Private schools fail public benefit test

16 July 2009
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Charities

Two out of five test case fee-charging schools have failed to fulfil the Charity Commission’s public benefit requirements.

Last October, the Commission selected five fee-charging schools, four religious charities and three care homes for its first public benefit assessments. This followed the enactment of the Charities Act 2006, which removed the legal presumption of public benefit in favour of charities in the fields of education, religion and poverty.

There is now an active duty on all charities to demonstrate that they fulfil the public benefit requirements.

The results of the assessments, announced this week, revealed that St Anselm’s School Trust, Highfield Priory School and Penylan House Jewish Retirement and Nursing Home failed to satisfy the Commission that the opportunity to benefit was not unreasonably restricted by a person’s ability to pay the fees charged.

The two schools were found to have failed because they did not provide sufficient bursary funding for pupils from poorer backgrounds.
One of three test case care homes also failed, while another care home was deemed to be acting outside its charitable objects.

The commission will now work with these charities over the next 12 months to look at how they might make the necessary changes.

Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll