header-logo header-logo

Private taxi operators take on Uber

17 July 2024
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Transport
printer mail-detail
Uber has lost its case against private hire vehicle operators over contract terms, in a decision with major financial implications for both local authorities and taxi companies

The Court of Appeal handed down judgment this week, in DELTA Merseyside and Veezu holdings v Uber Britannia [2024] EWCA Civ 802, overturning a High Court ruling last July that operators must enter as principal into a contract with passengers.

Intervening in the High Court case, private hire operators warned passengers would have to pay VAT on journeys, potentially raising fares by 20%.

Both DELTA and Veezu use an app to manage bookings, acting as intermediary between driver and passenger. Drivers pay DELTA a fee, called a ‘settle’, for putting them in touch with a customer. Veezu also provides services for school runs and medical transportation.

Lord Justice Lewison, giving the main judgment, said: ‘A booking may not necessarily specify any journey; or even be made for a journey at all.

‘A vehicle may be booked simply to be on stand-by. It is thus plain (and indeed is now common ground) that the declaration made by the judge is inappropriate. It assumes that the booking is made by "the passenger", which is not necessarily the case, and it assumes that the contract is one "to provide the journey" which is also not necessarily the case.’

Layla Barke-Jones, dispute resolution partner at Aaron & Partners, representing Delta Taxis, said the decision was ‘a victory for the taxi industry and all those who depend on it.

‘This frequently includes the disabled, elderly and low-income households. This was a landmark case, the result of which could have had a terrible impact on the lives of so many people—not to mention the administrative burden for operators.’

The case does not affect London, where different taxi regulations apply.

Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Transport
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll