header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 February 2013
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Privilege—Legal professional privilege—Scope

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another [2013] UKSC 1, [2013] All ER (D) 146 (Jan)

Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger P, Lord Hope DP, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption and Lord Reed SCJJ, 23 January 2013 

Legal advice privilege does not extend to communications in connection with advice given by professional people other than lawyers, even where that advice constitutes legal advice which that professional person is qualified to give, such as tax advice by a specialist tax accountant.

Lord Pannick QC and Conrad McDonnell (instructed by PricewaterhouseCoopers Legal LLP) for the claimants. James Eadie QC and Patrick Goodall (instructed by Solicitor to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs) for the defendants.

In 2004, an international firm of chartered accountants (PwC) devised a marketed tax avoidance scheme (the scheme), which they disclosed to the Commissioners for Inland Revenue (HMRC). It implemented the scheme for the benefit of the group of companies of which the claimant companies formed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Rent reforms unleash tribunal turmoil
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
NLJ this week: Jury cuts won’t cure court crisis
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
NLJ this week: Brain data could rewrite family justice
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
NLJ this week: Offensive speech still protected, court rules
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
NLJ this week: Arbitration appeals face hard stop
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll