header-logo header-logo

22 July 2010
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Privilege right upheld

Quinn ruling protects privileged information

Solicitors are not obliged to disclose privileged information to insurers in the absence of a claim or waiver, the Court of Appeal has held in an important case on disclosure.

In Quinn Direct Insurance v Law Society [2010] EWCA Civ 805, the appeal judges upheld the High Court’s decision that insurers could not access documents seized from a two-partner law firm during an intervention by the Solicitors Regulation Authority unless the client waived privilege.

The insurer, Quinn, wished to view the documents to assess whether it was obliged to indemnify the second partner of the firm. The Law Society argued the files were subject to legal privilege and could not be disclosed.

Nick Bird, partner at Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP, says: “Quinn argued that they were entitled to see the files because insurers of solicitors were part of the regulatory framework of solicitors in England and Wales.

“They also said that they were within a ‘circle of trust’ which entitled them to see confidential material but not to pass it on. The Court of Appeal rejected these arguments, so insurers will have greater difficulty in obtaining material to try and avoid cover in this situation.

“However, the court also said that this may now prevent solicitors from complying with their duties under the policy of insurance to disclose confidential information as part of the renewal and notification process. This may cause conflicts between the solicitor’s obligations under his insurance policy and the duty he has to his client.

“If the judgment is not appealed and remains the law then either some solicitors will have to revise their terms and conditions so that the client waives privilege for the purpose of notifying insurers, or insurance policies will have to be amended to prevent solicitors from being under any duty to disclose this material.”
 

Issue: 7427 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll