header-logo header-logo

Pro bono support for victims of London attack

09 June 2017
Issue: 7749 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Solicitors will provide pro bono legal advice to people bereaved or injured following the London Bridge attack. The Law Society is working with pro bono charity LawWorks and the City of London Law Society to draw up a panel of solicitor firms.

Law Society president Robert Bourns said the aim was to assist victims of the attack with any distressing practical issues that arise and relieve just a little of the worry. Firms are asked to register with the pro bono panel at londonprobono@lawsociety.org.uk .

A similar initiative by Manchester law Society following the attack in Manchester arena drew a huge response.

Issue: 7749 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll