header-logo header-logo

02 July 2014
Issue: 7613 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Problems with flexible working

Employers must avoid “dangerous pitfalls” surrounding new employee rights

Employees with more than 26 weeks of work under their belt now have a right to request flexible working.

Previously, the right applied only to employees with children or certain carer responsibilities. 

Employers must deal with the request in a “reasonable manner” but can refuse it if they have a good business reason for doing so. The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills offers examples of a “reasonable manner” as assessing the advantages and disadvantages, holding a meeting with the applicant and offering an appeal process. ACAS has produced a code of practice and guidance for employers.

However, Kathryn Dooks, employment partner at Kemp Little, says complications could arise for employers, particularly when receiving competing requests from the same team.

“Employers can take requests in the order they are received so getting a request in early can impact an employee’s chances of success and the options available subsequently for the rest of the team,” she says. 

“If the employer cannot decide between two competing requests, the guidance recommends that the employer can randomly select between the two. These scenarios are likely to cause discrimination complaints and employee relations issues. In addition, under the guidelines, employers are not required to make a value judgement on which is the most deserving request, but if an individual has a protected characteristic (such as a disabled member of staff or a working mother), value judgements are inevitable.

“Avoiding dangerous pitfalls around requests is very important and employers can do so by putting a flexible working policy in place which explains their approach from the outset.”

Meanwhile, employment lawyers have predicted a proposed ban on exclusivity in zero hours contracts may be difficult to enforce.

Luke Blackburn, barrister at 7 Bedford Row, says the contracts could be fair and desirable for some workers if “managed well”.

“But other problems remain with zero-hours contracts: several rights depend on the amount of work actually done. These include holiday pay, and many awards made by employment tribunals.”

 

Issue: 7613 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll