header-logo header-logo

02 July 2014
Issue: 7613 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Problems with flexible working

Employers must avoid “dangerous pitfalls” surrounding new employee rights

Employees with more than 26 weeks of work under their belt now have a right to request flexible working.

Previously, the right applied only to employees with children or certain carer responsibilities. 

Employers must deal with the request in a “reasonable manner” but can refuse it if they have a good business reason for doing so. The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills offers examples of a “reasonable manner” as assessing the advantages and disadvantages, holding a meeting with the applicant and offering an appeal process. ACAS has produced a code of practice and guidance for employers.

However, Kathryn Dooks, employment partner at Kemp Little, says complications could arise for employers, particularly when receiving competing requests from the same team.

“Employers can take requests in the order they are received so getting a request in early can impact an employee’s chances of success and the options available subsequently for the rest of the team,” she says. 

“If the employer cannot decide between two competing requests, the guidance recommends that the employer can randomly select between the two. These scenarios are likely to cause discrimination complaints and employee relations issues. In addition, under the guidelines, employers are not required to make a value judgement on which is the most deserving request, but if an individual has a protected characteristic (such as a disabled member of staff or a working mother), value judgements are inevitable.

“Avoiding dangerous pitfalls around requests is very important and employers can do so by putting a flexible working policy in place which explains their approach from the outset.”

Meanwhile, employment lawyers have predicted a proposed ban on exclusivity in zero hours contracts may be difficult to enforce.

Luke Blackburn, barrister at 7 Bedford Row, says the contracts could be fair and desirable for some workers if “managed well”.

“But other problems remain with zero-hours contracts: several rights depend on the amount of work actually done. These include holiday pay, and many awards made by employment tribunals.”

 

Issue: 7613 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll