header-logo header-logo

06 December 2018 / Vijay Ganapathy
Issue: 7820 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Problems on an industrial scale

Vijay Ganapathy considers how courts are tackling the issues associated with the treatment & costs of industrial diseases

  • New treatment options for mesothelioma sufferers.
  • Scope of vicarious liability.

The last few months have seen the courts determining some interesting issues relating to industrial disease. The Court of Appeal also considered whether to overturn a first instance decision on vicarious liability.

Immunotherapy

Starting with industrial disease, a topic currently attracting considerable attention in many asbestos disease cases is immunotherapy and how the costs of this relatively new treatment can be recovered by claimants.

Exposure to asbestos can cause mesothelioma which is a terminal cancer affecting the lining of the lungs. The choice of treatment for this condition has been quite limited so the possibility of undergoing immunotherapy has given many sufferers considerable hope.

Immunotherapy has been available for treatment of other types of cancer and recently, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) approved the use of two immunotherapy drugs for lung cancer patients. NICE are yet to provide similar

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll