header-logo header-logo

Procedure—Particulars of claim

11 October 2013
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Credit Suisse AG v Arabian Aircraft and Equipment Leasing Co EC and others [2013] All ER (D) 27 (Oct)

Particulars of claim were intended to define the claim being made. They were a formal document prepared for legal proceedings and could be expected to identify with care and precision the case the claimant was putting forward. They had to set out the essential allegations of fact on which the claimant relied and which he would seek to prove at trial, but they also had to state the nature of the case that was to be made in order to inform the defendant and the court of the basis on which it was said that the facts gave rise to a right to the remedy being claimed.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll