header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Profession unites

A coalition of eight organisations is calling on all political parties to put justice centre stage in the General Election campaign.

A coalition of eight organisations is calling on all political parties to put justice centre stage in the General Election campaign.

The coalition launched a “Manifesto for Justice” in the Houses of Parliament last week, identifying specific legal issues and calling for principles of justice to be upheld by all those involved in the political debate.

The coalition wants: more courage in the debate over the need to reduce reliance on custodial sentences; less legislation and more practical action on crime; greater access to justice; and increased efforts to convey the importance of respect for human rights.

Diane Burleigh, chief executive of ILEX, says: “We are demonstrating to current politicians and aspiring politicians that there are a range of legal issues on which the whole sector is agreed, and that the politicians should take these seriously. The manifesto covers specific issues affecting family law, criminal law, human rights and responsibilities. The most important thing is that the whole sector, across the professions, have come together to agree that these are serious issues.”

The coalition includes AdviceUK, the Bar Council, ILEX, Justice, the Law Centres Federation, the Legal Action Group, the Legal Aid Practioners Group and Liberty.
 

Issue: 7397 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll