header-logo header-logo

28 March 2014
Issue: 7601 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Profits rise for law firms

Natwest report provides further reason for optimism

UK law firms are optimistic and reaping impressive profits according to recent reports, signalling an end to the economic downturn.

The second annual Natwest Financial Benchmarking Report into small and medium enterprise law firms operating outside the UK top 100 found optimism at an “all time high”. 92% of respondents think their profits will grow or remain the same in 2014 with nearly half predicting growth of up to 10%.

On average, firms reported a 7% increase in profits from last year. However, smaller firms, with less than £1.5m annual fees, reported a 15% jump with larger firms achieving just 3% profit growth. 

Fees rose by an average of 3%.

The results confirm the findings of the LexisNexis Bellwether Report 2014 Brave New World, published last week, which reported the rise of new working practices, increased optimism and the emergence of a new breed of entrepreneurial lawyer.

The Natwest report is based on a survey of more than 380 firms and 400 legal professionals attending the bank’s legal conference.

Steve Arundale, head of professionals at Natwest and RBS, says: “Comparing a firm’s profit (per equity partner) and fee growth gives a great indication of their efficiency. 

“For example, Scottish firms came out as the most efficient in the country, posting profits at an average of 27% despite fees remaining the same. This is compared to firms in London whose fees rose by 6% while profit dipped below Scotland at 22%. 

“It was also good to see firms in the South West posting revenue growth of 2% against a flat performance in 2012.”

Firms in the South East and the North grew profit by 11%% against a 3% fee rise.

“One of the key issues we find firms have is in understanding the relationship between profit and cash,” Arundale said. 

“For example, a firm is unlikely to improve its position if it concentrates solely on growing revenue and profit and fails to look at the finer points like improving efficiency and lock up days.”

Median profit per equity partner was £87,000 with the figure dropping to £64,000 in small firms and rising to £133,000 in large firms.

 

Issue: 7601 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll