header-logo header-logo

09 July 2025
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Progress ‘too slow’ on judicial diversity

The Bar Council has raised concerns after the latest judicial diversity statistics showed no movement on the under-representation of Black lawyers among the judiciary

Since 2015, the number of judges from different ethnic minority backgrounds has increased from 7% to 12%, but the number of Black judges has remained at 1% of the total, according to the judicial diversity statistics 2024–25, published this week.

Bar Council chair, Barbara Mils KC, who is a deputy High Court judge, said: ‘Every year we are told that there is gradual progress being made towards a more diverse judiciary, but it’s far too slow for Black lawyers and this is no longer good enough.

‘We are concerned that candidates from a minority ethnic background, and in particular Black lawyers, are disproportionately ruled out at each step of the recruitment process. We are told that this data is not statistically relevant. We disagree. It is relevant and requires scrutiny.’

The diversity statistics also showed the under-representation of solicitors in the judiciary. The courts judiciary is composed of 70% barristers and 30% solicitors. In the tribunals, the split is roughly 40% barristers and 60% solicitors. Taken together, the judiciary as a whole is made up of 60% barristers to 40% solicitors.

Women are proportionately represented in all but the highest echelons of the judiciary—44% of all judges but only 23% in the Court of Appeal (nine Lady Justices) and 30% in the High Court (32 judges).

One in ten judges (8% in courts and 15% in tribunals) reported they are disabled.

Baroness Carr said: ‘I am determined to improve diversity in the judiciary. It is one of my key priorities.’

Law Society president, Richard Atkinson said: ‘Solicitors are continuing to achieve appointments as judges at disproportionately low rates compared with barristers and the numbers are falling.’

Issue: 8124 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll