header-logo header-logo

Progress on open justice or administrative fiat?

19 January 2024 / David Burrows
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Features , Family , In Court
printer mail-detail
153984
David Burrows raises some questions about the Family Division’s open justice pilot scheme
  • Does the President of the Family Division have administrative powers to set up an open justice pilot scheme; or should this be done by the family proceedings rule makers?
  • Can the President by administrative diktat override a financial remedy party’s anonymity, and without regard for the rights of any children affected?
  • Can the lawfulness of administrative actions be challenged judicially in the family courts proceedings in which they arise?

On 11 December 2023, the president of the Family Division issued guidance on the transparency reporting pilot for financial remedy proceedings. The pilot comes into operation on 29 January 2024. If the guidance is challenged, the pilot scheme may be found unlawful in at least two respects:

  • First, has the president power to set up a ‘pilot’ scheme at all? In this context he is an administrator, so what are his statutory powers (if any) to act in this way?
  • Second, is it lawful for
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll