header-logo header-logo

25 May 2017 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7747 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

Promises promises...(Pt 2)

nlj_7747_robins

Jon Robins reflects on some absences from the Conservative manifesto & LASPO’s shadow

If NLJ readers want to understand where ‘access to justice’ ranks alongside the big policy questions of the day as we approach June 8, a brief flick through the Conservative Party’s election manifesto will leave them in little doubt.

It doesn’t. The words ‘legal aid’ are mentioned once and even then the topic doesn’t warrant an entire sentence. ‘We will strengthen legal services regulation and restrict legal aid for unscrupulous law firms that issue vexatious legal claims against the armed forces,’ it reads.

For the Tories, and (in their view) prospective voters, ‘legal aid’ has become synonymous with abuse. The topic is only relevant in the context of tank chasing personal injury lawyers ‘hounding’ the men and women of the military. It is a policy that will only have added to the joy of the Daily Mail already cock-a-hoop with a manifesto that, in its view, managed to both ‘invoke the spirit of Churchill and Thatcher’.

Compare & contrast

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll