header-logo header-logo

21 November 2018
Issue: 7818 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Proper disclosure requires payment

Criminal justice review reveals critical lack of compliance

The government has promised to take a ‘zero tolerance’ approach to disclosure in the criminal justice system, after its own review uncovered systematic failings.

The ‘Review of the efficiency and effectiveness of disclosure in the criminal justice system’ was commissioned in December 2017 and coincided with the collapse of several high-profile prosecutions due to disclosure of evidence issues, notably the Liam Allan case. It found the duty to record, retain and review material collected was not routinely complied with by police and prosecutors and this was causing, at the least, costly delays and at worst meant cases were being pursued without sufficient evidence.

Disclosure is the process by which the accused is provided with investigation materials that could undermine the prosecution case against them or assist their defence.

Publishing the 78-page review this week, Attorney General Geoffrey Cox QC MP said: ‘For too long, disclosure has been seen as an administrative add on rather than fundamental pillar of our justice system. This ends now.’

The review recommends incentivising early preparation and engagement between prosecution and defence, and reviewing the current level of criminal legal aid payments.

Andrew Walker QC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘The review recognises that changes will need to be made to the criminal legal aid fee schemes if early preparation and engagement is to happen, and be effective. 

‘Fees for that work, at proper rates, will be essential. But this will also require the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to be funded properly, so that it can employ the necessary staff. We note the absence of any such recommendation.’

According to Bar Council research, CPS funding has fallen 34% in real terms in the past ten years.

Law Society president Christina Blacklaws welcomed the review’s acknowledgement that ‘the current fee structure for police station attendance is not designed for a large amount of pre-charge work by the defence’.

Issue: 7818 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll