header-logo header-logo

Proper disclosure requires payment

21 November 2018
Issue: 7818 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Criminal justice review reveals critical lack of compliance

The government has promised to take a ‘zero tolerance’ approach to disclosure in the criminal justice system, after its own review uncovered systematic failings.

The ‘Review of the efficiency and effectiveness of disclosure in the criminal justice system’ was commissioned in December 2017 and coincided with the collapse of several high-profile prosecutions due to disclosure of evidence issues, notably the Liam Allan case. It found the duty to record, retain and review material collected was not routinely complied with by police and prosecutors and this was causing, at the least, costly delays and at worst meant cases were being pursued without sufficient evidence.

Disclosure is the process by which the accused is provided with investigation materials that could undermine the prosecution case against them or assist their defence.

Publishing the 78-page review this week, Attorney General Geoffrey Cox QC MP said: ‘For too long, disclosure has been seen as an administrative add on rather than fundamental pillar of our justice system. This ends now.’

The review recommends incentivising early preparation and engagement between prosecution and defence, and reviewing the current level of criminal legal aid payments.

Andrew Walker QC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘The review recognises that changes will need to be made to the criminal legal aid fee schemes if early preparation and engagement is to happen, and be effective. 

‘Fees for that work, at proper rates, will be essential. But this will also require the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to be funded properly, so that it can employ the necessary staff. We note the absence of any such recommendation.’

According to Bar Council research, CPS funding has fallen 34% in real terms in the past ten years.

Law Society president Christina Blacklaws welcomed the review’s acknowledgement that ‘the current fee structure for police station attendance is not designed for a large amount of pre-charge work by the defence’.

Issue: 7818 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll