header-logo header-logo

21 November 2018
Issue: 7818 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Proper disclosure requires payment

Criminal justice review reveals critical lack of compliance

The government has promised to take a ‘zero tolerance’ approach to disclosure in the criminal justice system, after its own review uncovered systematic failings.

The ‘Review of the efficiency and effectiveness of disclosure in the criminal justice system’ was commissioned in December 2017 and coincided with the collapse of several high-profile prosecutions due to disclosure of evidence issues, notably the Liam Allan case. It found the duty to record, retain and review material collected was not routinely complied with by police and prosecutors and this was causing, at the least, costly delays and at worst meant cases were being pursued without sufficient evidence.

Disclosure is the process by which the accused is provided with investigation materials that could undermine the prosecution case against them or assist their defence.

Publishing the 78-page review this week, Attorney General Geoffrey Cox QC MP said: ‘For too long, disclosure has been seen as an administrative add on rather than fundamental pillar of our justice system. This ends now.’

The review recommends incentivising early preparation and engagement between prosecution and defence, and reviewing the current level of criminal legal aid payments.

Andrew Walker QC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘The review recognises that changes will need to be made to the criminal legal aid fee schemes if early preparation and engagement is to happen, and be effective. 

‘Fees for that work, at proper rates, will be essential. But this will also require the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to be funded properly, so that it can employ the necessary staff. We note the absence of any such recommendation.’

According to Bar Council research, CPS funding has fallen 34% in real terms in the past ten years.

Law Society president Christina Blacklaws welcomed the review’s acknowledgement that ‘the current fee structure for police station attendance is not designed for a large amount of pre-charge work by the defence’.

Issue: 7818 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll