header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Propert Law Update

King v Udlaw Ltd (2008) Lands Tribunal >>
S v Floyd (The Equality and Human Rights Commission Intervening)

service charges

Many people choose to holiday in properties let to them on a long-term basis, whether a cottage in the hills or a chalet by the beach. What is the status of such properties in the various statutory regimes dealing with the regulation of tenancies of residential accommodation? In particular, how far do the restrictions relating to demands for service charges in ss 18 et seq of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985) apply?

The Lands Tribunal has recently considered this latter question in King & Ors v Udlaw Ltd (2008) Lands Tribunal LRX/186/2006, producing the first authoritative determination on the point. It held that the holiday bungalows it was considering fell outside the ambit of the statutory protection.

In King, the appellant tenants had long leases of holiday bungalows at a holiday park in Cornwall. Planning permission for the park required that it should be used for holiday purposes only, and not for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll