header-logo header-logo

04 January 2007 / Mark Sefton
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Property Law Update

Mark Sefton explains the reasons behind the current popularity of leasehold enfranchisement

Leasehold enfranchisement is big business these days. One reason for this is that, since the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 came into force, tenants no longer have to occupy the property as their residence to qualify to bring a claim. Developers can now buy a lease of a house or a flat and, so long as the conveyancing has been tied up neatly, they can claim the freehold or a 90-year lease extension, even though they have no intention of ever living in the property. Institutional investors with portfolios of rack rents in the residential market can do the same. It has even been possible, in one case, for the head lessee of a large mansion block in east London to claim statutory lease extensions on all 28 of the flats within the building—Maurice v Hollow-Ware Products Ltd [2005] 2 EGLR 71, [2005] EWHC 815 (Ch), [2005] All ER (D) 254 (Mar).

Financial magic

Another reason for the current popularity of leasehold

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll