header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 July 2020 / Philip Sissons
Issue: 7894 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Property law & the COVID-19 pandemic

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
23963
Will the easing of lockdown restrictions also unleash a wave of property related litigation? Phil Sissons, Falcon Chambers

Introduction

At this stage of the pandemic, it feels trite to say that the impact upon property law has been both profound and unprecedented. Even the devastating financial crash of 2008 did not have the same all-encompassing impact on the day-to-day use of property of all types. Faced with this crisis, the immediate focus has, of necessity, been on the rapidly implemented procedural restrictions (to say nothing of the practical problems of conducting litigation in lockdown). The general stay on possession proceedings implemented via PD 51Z has already been considered three times by the Court of Appeal: (London Borough of Hackney v Okoro [2020] EWCA Civ 681, [2020] All ER (D) 154 (May); Arkin v Marshall [2020] EWCA Civ 620, [2020] All ER (D) 65 (May); TFS Stores Limited v The Designer Retail Outlet Centres (Mansfield) General Partner Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 833). The moratorium on forfeiture for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll