header-logo header-logo

17 July 2008 / Tamsin Cox
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Property law update

UNREASONABLE CAR PARKING SCHEME
UNEQUIVOCAL RENT DEMAND
PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHTS TO LIGHT

PARKING SCHEME
Shah & Ors v Colvia Management Co Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 195, [2008] All ER (D) 256 (Mar) concerned a management company’s proposed alterations to a parking scheme in use by lessees of units in an industrial park. The management company (Colvia) had been established to manage an estate comprising some 87 industrial units held on 999 year leases, each lessee having shares in the company, and had subsequently acquired the freehold also, so that the estate was controlled by its occupants.

Two issues arose in relation to the parking provision at the estate: lack of space, and the imposition of non-domestic rates by the local authority. The space issue arose because the various parking areas provided room for only 350 to 370 vehicles. Additional pressure for parking was caused by the Claimants, who were six lessees who ran car repair companies from the estate.Taking into account cars awaiting inspection and repair as well as courtesy vehicles, these six lessees required around

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll