header-logo header-logo

09 March 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Property Litigation Association—Judge Elizabeth Cooke

Property Litigation Association appoints new president

Judge Elizabeth Cooke has been appointed as the new President of the Property Litigation Association (PLA), as Liz Peace CBE steps down from the role after a five-year term.

Judge Cooke has been a Judge in the Lands Chamber of the Upper Tribunal since 2019. She was admitted as a solicitor in 1988, and was a professor of law at the University of Reading from 2003 to 2015. From 2008 to 2015 she was a Law Commissioner for England and Wales with responsibility for property law reform projects. She has been a Deputy High Court Judge since 2013, and from 2015 to 2019 she was Principal Judge of the Land Registration Division of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).

Judge Cooke co-authored the 9th edition of Megarry and Wade: The Law of Real Property (2019); other publications include Estoppel (2000); The New Law of Land Registration (2002); and Land Law in the Oxford Clarendon series (2006, 2012 and 2020). At the Law Commission she led projects on easements, rights to light, telecommunications law, and conservation covenants.

Speaking of her appointment, Judge Cooke said: 'The Property Litigation Association plays a vital role in championing high standards in litigation practice and legal education, and in advocating effective law reform—all immensely important in the aftermath of the pandemic as the real property market recovers and professional relationships are re-examined and rebuilt. I am honoured to have the opportunity to support the PLA as its President and I look forward to working with its members.'

Mathew Ditchburn, Chair of the Property Litigation Association, added: 'We look forward to welcoming our amazing new President, Judge Cooke. She is well known to property litigators and highly-regarded by all those who have had the pleasure of dealing with her. We are incredibly grateful to Liz Peace for her invaluable contribution to the Property Litigation Association as President over the past five years. Thanks to Liz’s wisdom and guidance, we enter this next chapter of the PLA a better and more relevant association than ever before.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll