header-logo header-logo

15 August 2023
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Proposals to clarify parity of CILEX lawyers & solicitors

CILEX lawyers could be given clearer professional titles to improve public understanding of their role and equivalence with solicitors, as part of a regulatory shake-up

The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEX) launched a consultation, Enhancing consumer trust & confidence, this week on a series of regulatory proposals. They include introducing specialist Chartered Lawyer titles to clarify that CILEX Lawyers with independent practice rights have parity with solicitor counterparts in these areas of practice. The Chartered Lawyer title awarded to CILEX Fellows on qualification would therefore reflect their specialist practice areas, for example, Chartered Property Lawyer and Chartered Corporate Lawyer.

The consultation also proposes the Solicitors Regulation Authority take over the regulation of CILEX members, and that voting rights be extended to all CILEX members instead of the current position where only CILEX Fellows have a vote. It proposes creating a paralegal standards framework and career ladder that offers the opportunity to become a Chartered Paralegal linked to a professional register, and creating a ‘legal technologist’ membership grade as part of preparations for an apprenticeship that is currently being developed.

The proposals guarantee the distinct identity of CILEX Lawyers, Paralegals and CILEX-led entities will be maintained, along with the separate CILEX route into law.

CILEX Chair, Professor Chris Bones said: ‘Following recent successes removing legislative, policy and funding barriers, we are pushing on with our reform agenda, looking at how we can create a sustainable regulatory framework with the drive towards a more diverse, accessible and equitable legal profession at its heart.’

CILEX CEO, Linda Ford said: ‘We want to encourage both the legal profession and consumer bodies to engage with this consultation process so that we can ensure that the changes we make benefit both society and the legal sector.’

The consultation is open until 5 November 2023.

Issue: 8038 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll