header-logo header-logo

31 March 2021
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Costs
printer mail-detail

Proposals to increase court fees

The Ministry of Justice is consulting on proposals to raise court fees, to raise 'an extra £11m-£17m’

It proposes backdating increases by inflation to 2016, with 133 fees affected. Fees for judicial reviews and tribunals cases would not be affected.

Under the proposals, the fee to file for divorce would rise from £550 to £592, an application for parental order would rise from £215 to £232, and a hearing fee for a multi-track case would rise from £1,090 to £1,174.

The threshold for Help with Fees would rise from £1,085 to £1,165 for a single person’s monthly income before tax, from £1,245 to £1,335 for a couple, and from £245 to £265 for additional income per dependent child.

The consultation on ‘increasing selected court fees and Help with Fees income thresholds by inflation’ closes on 17 May.

Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll