header-logo header-logo

26 March 2025
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Fees
printer mail-detail

Proposed boost to civil legal aid fees

Lawyers have welcomed a proposal to raise civil legal aid fees by 10%-42% but called for more.

The Ministry of Justice’s consultation, ‘Civil legal aid: towards a sustainable future’, closed last week. The £20m boost would be the first increase in civil legal aid in 30 years, despite a 96.8% rise in the consumer price index in that time.

The Bar Council’s response emphasises the technical complexity of housing and immigration law, and increased demands on practitioners arising from client vulnerability. It calls for counsel to be paid hourly rates rather than a fixed fee and for travel and waiting time, and highlights the contrast between the proposed fees and the rates the government pays when it instructs civil barristers in non-legal aid work.

It states: ‘It is not clear how the government paying half the rate for doing legal aid work than it does for doing non-legal aid work, encourages “the best and brightest” to do legal aid work.’

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘A significantly greater uplift is required to genuinely create sustainability and adequately address the complexity of immigration and housing work. 

‘We’re calling for regular independent fee reviews to ensure parity with broader market rates to attract and retain talented legal professionals into this vital work. This is a critical area where we believe the government should spend now to save future costs. 

‘Evidence shows that early legal support prevents problems escalating with increased costs to the taxpayer.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘Raising the rates is welcome, however the government admits this would still leave a quarter of housing legal aid providers unable to help people who desperately need advice.’ Atkinson said a 95% rise would be needed to restore legal aid fees to the 1996 levels in real terms. 

Issue: 8110 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll