header-logo header-logo

Proposed boost to civil legal aid fees

26 March 2025
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Fees
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have welcomed a proposal to raise civil legal aid fees by 10%-42% but called for more.

The Ministry of Justice’s consultation, ‘Civil legal aid: towards a sustainable future’, closed last week. The £20m boost would be the first increase in civil legal aid in 30 years, despite a 96.8% rise in the consumer price index in that time.

The Bar Council’s response emphasises the technical complexity of housing and immigration law, and increased demands on practitioners arising from client vulnerability. It calls for counsel to be paid hourly rates rather than a fixed fee and for travel and waiting time, and highlights the contrast between the proposed fees and the rates the government pays when it instructs civil barristers in non-legal aid work.

It states: ‘It is not clear how the government paying half the rate for doing legal aid work than it does for doing non-legal aid work, encourages “the best and brightest” to do legal aid work.’

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘A significantly greater uplift is required to genuinely create sustainability and adequately address the complexity of immigration and housing work. 

‘We’re calling for regular independent fee reviews to ensure parity with broader market rates to attract and retain talented legal professionals into this vital work. This is a critical area where we believe the government should spend now to save future costs. 

‘Evidence shows that early legal support prevents problems escalating with increased costs to the taxpayer.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘Raising the rates is welcome, however the government admits this would still leave a quarter of housing legal aid providers unable to help people who desperately need advice.’ Atkinson said a 95% rise would be needed to restore legal aid fees to the 1996 levels in real terms. 

Issue: 8110 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll