header-logo header-logo

14 August 2019
Issue: 7853 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Protect our cohabitees, say lawyers

Increase in number of cohabiting families underscores need for reform

Family lawyers have called for the law to catch up with modern life after official figures revealed a big increase in cohabiting couple families.

According to Office for National Statistics figures released last week, the number of families in the UK rose 8% from 17.7m to 19.1m in the decade 2008 to 2018. During that time, however, the number of cohabiting couple families rose by 25.8%.

Despite the societal change, however, lawyers say many cohabitees still mistakenly believe the law will protect them if their relationship breaks down.

Neil Russell, family partner at Seddons, said: ‘There remains the biggest myth of all in the belief that there is a “common law spouse”. There is no such thing.

‘Entitlement to share in a home is not automatic for the non-owning party. Only strict property rights apply. There is no entitlement to maintenance, other than for children. No entitlement to automatically inherit on death or to share a pension.

‘Parliament needs to legislate and in the meantime people need to be informed of the potential dangers of not securing their position in the event of a relationship coming to an end on the break up or death of a party.’

Graeme Fraser, partner at OGR Stock Denton and chair of family lawyers group Resolution’s cohabitation committee, said: ‘These statistics should come as no surprise, with even the Prime Minister being in a cohabiting relationship.

‘The fact that the number of cohabiting families is rising so quickly underscores the need for urgent reform so that couples who have lived together for a period of time enjoy certain automatic rights, unless they chose to opt out.’

In 2007, the Law Commission, which advises the government on law reform, recommended a statutory scheme of financial relief on separation, but the recommendations were not brought forward by the government. In 2018, the government said it would consider proceeding with the proposals, but no further announcement has been made.

Cohabiting couples in Scotland can make limited claims against each other on death or when a relationship breaks down. Northern Ireland also grants cohabitees legal protection in some areas.

For more, see David Burrows' NLJ article, 'Till divorce do us part' (10 May 2019).

Issue: 7853 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll