header-logo header-logo

14 August 2019
Issue: 7853 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Protect our cohabitees, say lawyers

Increase in number of cohabiting families underscores need for reform

Family lawyers have called for the law to catch up with modern life after official figures revealed a big increase in cohabiting couple families.

According to Office for National Statistics figures released last week, the number of families in the UK rose 8% from 17.7m to 19.1m in the decade 2008 to 2018. During that time, however, the number of cohabiting couple families rose by 25.8%.

Despite the societal change, however, lawyers say many cohabitees still mistakenly believe the law will protect them if their relationship breaks down.

Neil Russell, family partner at Seddons, said: ‘There remains the biggest myth of all in the belief that there is a “common law spouse”. There is no such thing.

‘Entitlement to share in a home is not automatic for the non-owning party. Only strict property rights apply. There is no entitlement to maintenance, other than for children. No entitlement to automatically inherit on death or to share a pension.

‘Parliament needs to legislate and in the meantime people need to be informed of the potential dangers of not securing their position in the event of a relationship coming to an end on the break up or death of a party.’

Graeme Fraser, partner at OGR Stock Denton and chair of family lawyers group Resolution’s cohabitation committee, said: ‘These statistics should come as no surprise, with even the Prime Minister being in a cohabiting relationship.

‘The fact that the number of cohabiting families is rising so quickly underscores the need for urgent reform so that couples who have lived together for a period of time enjoy certain automatic rights, unless they chose to opt out.’

In 2007, the Law Commission, which advises the government on law reform, recommended a statutory scheme of financial relief on separation, but the recommendations were not brought forward by the government. In 2018, the government said it would consider proceeding with the proposals, but no further announcement has been made.

Cohabiting couples in Scotland can make limited claims against each other on death or when a relationship breaks down. Northern Ireland also grants cohabitees legal protection in some areas.

For more, see David Burrows' NLJ article, 'Till divorce do us part' (10 May 2019).

Issue: 7853 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll