header-logo header-logo

09 June 2021
Issue: 7936 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Protecting inventions post-Brexit

The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has launched a ‘consultation on the UK’s future exhaustion of intellectual property rights regime’.

Exhaustion of IP rights underpins parallel trade (import and export of IP-protected goods that have already been first sold in a specific market). Prior to 2021, parallel goods were able to move freely in both directions between the UK and EEA. Since 1 January, the UK no longer participates in the EU’s regional exhaustion system, and a legal default has come into effect.

The consultation asks whether this regime should continue or, if not, what should replace it. It is likely to be of interest to legal practitioners and any clients who move, sell or rely on goods that have already been first placed on the market in another territory.

View the consultation here and email your completed response form to IPExhaustion@ipo.gov.uk by 11.45pm on 31 August.
Issue: 7936 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll