header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Protecting the judiciary

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
08 September 2017 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7760 / Categories: Features , Profession , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7760_qureshi

If we value the rule of law, we must not take our judges for granted, says Khawar Qureshi QC

  • The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 removed the Lord Chancellor from the centuries-old role of head of the judiciary.
  • The judiciary has since been subjected to increased attacks from politicians and the media, yet are prevented from answering back.

One of the most radical and unexpected changes to the position of the judiciary took place on 12 June 2003, when the Labour Government abruptly announced the abolition of the centuries old role of the Lord Chancellor who had hitherto been described as ‘the lightning rod between the executive and the judiciary’. Lord Irvine was removed from the post of Lord Chancellor, and replaced by Lord Falconer who immediately encountered heavy criticism and resistance for the lack of consultation with the judiciary, and the somewhat hasty approach that was being adopted.

The late Lord Bingham, in his article in the Law Quarterly Review [2006] 211 at p 220, observed that: ‘Whether as widely believed,
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: DNA evidence—justice on ice?
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll