header-logo header-logo

Protecting the pedestrian

17 November 2017 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7770 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7770_samuels

Alec Samuels addresses an irresponsible minority & lays down the law for safer pavements

The pedestrian on the footway needs protection from the unlawful or irresponsible cyclist and mobility scooter driver. The pedestrian has been intimidated, knocked down and injured. The pedestrian may be a child, an old person, a disabled person, indeed anybody. Abuse of the footway is rife, albeit by a minority of irresponsible people.

Careless cycling is an offence (Road Traffic Act 1988 s 29, penalty level 3 fine), and dangerous cycling is an offence (Road Traffic Act 1988 s 28, penalty level 4 fine). Doing or causing to be done bodily harm by wanton or furious driving of any carriage (which includes cycle) is an offence (Offences Against the Person Act 1861 s 35, penalty maximum two years).

Charlie Alliston who caused the death of a pedestrian on the carriageway by wanton or furious driving of an unroadworthy cycle was convicted not of manslaughter but of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, and sentenced in September 2017 to 18 months

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll