header-logo header-logo

Protecting the pedestrian

17 November 2017 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7770 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7770_samuels

Alec Samuels addresses an irresponsible minority & lays down the law for safer pavements

The pedestrian on the footway needs protection from the unlawful or irresponsible cyclist and mobility scooter driver. The pedestrian has been intimidated, knocked down and injured. The pedestrian may be a child, an old person, a disabled person, indeed anybody. Abuse of the footway is rife, albeit by a minority of irresponsible people.

Careless cycling is an offence (Road Traffic Act 1988 s 29, penalty level 3 fine), and dangerous cycling is an offence (Road Traffic Act 1988 s 28, penalty level 4 fine). Doing or causing to be done bodily harm by wanton or furious driving of any carriage (which includes cycle) is an offence (Offences Against the Person Act 1861 s 35, penalty maximum two years).

Charlie Alliston who caused the death of a pedestrian on the carriageway by wanton or furious driving of an unroadworthy cycle was convicted not of manslaughter but of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, and sentenced in September 2017 to 18 months

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll