header-logo header-logo

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Protective costs orders

Amanda Wadey explains why the Corner House procedure must be followed as much as possible

Protective costs orders (PCOs)

Refs: R (on the application on Compton) v Wiltshire Primary Care Trust [2008] All ER (D) 12 (Jul)

PCOs limit the amount a losing party must pay. They can be distinguished from costs capping orders that limit the amount a party can recover.

PCOs are more often made in judicial review proceedings where claimants with
limited resources pursue claims that may benefit others. There is currently no guidance in the CPR on the principles to be applied in determining whether or not such an order should be made or the procedure that should be followed. However, case law has determined that:
 The issues raised should be of general importance.
 It is in the public interest to resolve the issues raised.
 The applicant has no private interest in the income.
 If the PCO is not made, the proceedings will probably be discontinued
 It is just and fair to make the order.

Facts of the case

Refs:

R (on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
4PB chambers has announced the 2026 winner of its Alan Inglis Memorial Essay Prize, now in its third year
Murder could be split into first and second degrees, under Law Commission proposals for a historic overhaul of homicide offences
Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Australian-style ban on social media for under-16s will be difficult to enforce, lawyers have warned
One in two women in law say their current working pattern is unsustainable for their long-term health, according to a report by the Next 100 Years project
The Legal Services Board (LSB) has highlighted a lack of safeguards where people use artificial intelligence (AI) tools to help with legal problems
back-to-top-scroll