header-logo header-logo

22 May 2024
Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Protest restrictions are unlawful

The High Court has quashed restrictions to public protest introduced last year by former Home Secretary Suella Braverman

In R (National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin), Lord Justice Green and Mr Justice Kerr held that Braverman acted unlawfully when she introduced regulations lowering the threshold at which police can impose conditions to ‘more than minor’ disruption.

Under the Public Order Act 1986, the Home Secretary can use secondary legislation to clarify the meaning of ‘serious disruption’. The court held Braverman acted ultra vires.

Shameem Ahmad, CEO of Public Law Project, which intervened in the case, said the ruling ‘recognises that our rights and constitution cannot be unilaterally and arbitrarily undermined by the executive’.

Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll