header-logo header-logo

22 May 2024
Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Protest restrictions are unlawful

The High Court has quashed restrictions to public protest introduced last year by former Home Secretary Suella Braverman

In R (National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin), Lord Justice Green and Mr Justice Kerr held that Braverman acted unlawfully when she introduced regulations lowering the threshold at which police can impose conditions to ‘more than minor’ disruption.

Under the Public Order Act 1986, the Home Secretary can use secondary legislation to clarify the meaning of ‘serious disruption’. The court held Braverman acted ultra vires.

Shameem Ahmad, CEO of Public Law Project, which intervened in the case, said the ruling ‘recognises that our rights and constitution cannot be unilaterally and arbitrarily undermined by the executive’.

Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll