header-logo header-logo

29 November 2007 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7299 / Categories: Features , EU , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Protesting their innocence

Seamus Burns is concerned that executive blunderbuss could blow away the rights of peaceful demonstrators

T he recent Court of Appeal decision in Austin and another v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2007] EWCA Civ 989, [2007] All ER (D) 197 (Oct), signals a worryingly restrictive and diluted interpretation of Art 5 (right to liberty) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) allied to a correspondingly generous interpretation of police powers controlling protest in a democratic society.

MAY DAY BLUES

The facts of this case are well known. On May Day 2001 (not a Bank Holiday) at about 2pm, a crowd of demonstrators marched into Oxford Circus in London from Regent Street South. Later, other people entered or tried to enter from all points of the compass. Hence, at the end of the day there were around 3,000 people in Oxford Circus. Furthermore, in the general vicinity were crowds of thousands to the north of Oxford Street and on the west side of Oxford Street.

The Metropolitan Police had information that a demonstration

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll