header-logo header-logo

28 July 2023 / Sarah Moore , Stuart Warmington , Lily Parmar
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Features , Public , Inquests , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Public inquiries & product liability: mind the (accountability) gap

132292
Public inquiries related to product liability do vital work but are undermined by a lack of accountability & commitment to action, as Sarah Moore, Stuart Warmington & Lily Parmar explain
  • The UK has a robust culture of instigating inquiries, but it is less clear whether their recommendations are acted upon.
  • Claimants in high-profile liability scandals often have to campaign for years.
  • Greater monitoring and reporting could help redress this accountability gap.

On 5 May 2023, the World Health Organization declared an end to the coronavirus as a ‘global health emergency’. Nevertheless, as we move into our second post-pandemic summer, COVID-19 remains omnipresent in the headlines as the public hearings for the UK’s COVID-19 inquiry get underway. This inquiry is set to be one of the biggest and most expensive in UK history. As the inquiry chair Baroness Hallett highlighted in her opening statement, its purpose is to enable the government to ‘learn lessons to inform preparations for future pandemics’.

In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll