header-logo header-logo

28 July 2023 / Sarah Moore , Stuart Warmington , Lily Parmar
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Features , Public , Inquests , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Public inquiries & product liability: mind the (accountability) gap

132292
Public inquiries related to product liability do vital work but are undermined by a lack of accountability & commitment to action, as Sarah Moore, Stuart Warmington & Lily Parmar explain
  • The UK has a robust culture of instigating inquiries, but it is less clear whether their recommendations are acted upon.
  • Claimants in high-profile liability scandals often have to campaign for years.
  • Greater monitoring and reporting could help redress this accountability gap.

On 5 May 2023, the World Health Organization declared an end to the coronavirus as a ‘global health emergency’. Nevertheless, as we move into our second post-pandemic summer, COVID-19 remains omnipresent in the headlines as the public hearings for the UK’s COVID-19 inquiry get underway. This inquiry is set to be one of the biggest and most expensive in UK history. As the inquiry chair Baroness Hallett highlighted in her opening statement, its purpose is to enable the government to ‘learn lessons to inform preparations for future pandemics’.

In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll