header-logo header-logo

10 February 2021 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Features , Public , International justice
printer mail-detail

Public international law: 2020 in review

38903
Khawar Qureshi QC provides an overview of the key public international law cases before the English courts in 2020
  • EU treaty and ICSID treaty obligations.
  • The scope of diplomatic immunity.
  • The English courts’ approach to International Court of Justice advisory opinions.
  • Recognition of foreign heads of state.
  • UN and EU sanctions issues.
  • The ‘commercial exception’ to state immunity.

In 2020, there were 31 reported cases involving issues of public international law. The main themes were the scope of diplomatic immunity, the operation of the ‘commercial exception’ to state immunity pursuant to the State Immunity Act 1978 (SIA 1978), and cases relating to the interpretation of UN/EU economic sanctions, as well as the approach of the English court to International Court of Justice (ICJ) advisory opinions. There was also a highly politically charged dispute concerning the recognition of the head of a foreign state.

EU treaty & ICSID treaty obligations

In the case of Micula and others v Romania (European Commission intervening)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll