header-logo header-logo

11 May 2012
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Case law , Civil way , In Court
printer mail-detail

Public order

R (on the application of Gallastegui) v Westminster City Council [2012] EWHC 1123 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 144 (Apr)

Although ss 143 and 145 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 (PRSRA 2011) referred respectively to “a prohibited activity” and “a prohibited item”, it was very clear from the wording of those sections that those activities and items only became prohibited if and when the constable or authorised officer decided to exercise the power to make a direction in the case of s 143 or a seizure in the case of s 145. If a person empowered to act under s 143 or 145 acted in breach of the rights of a particular person under Arts 10 or 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), then that person would be entitled to various remedies. Further, balancing the respective interests, no additional positive obligation was required of the state because of the limited effects of ss 143 and 145. The PRSRA 2011 conferred powers which, if exercised, constituted a restriction which only related to sleeping items.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll