header-logo header-logo

Public Order Act: crossing the (thin blue) line? (Pt 2)

21 May 2021 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7933 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Public
printer mail-detail
49414
One-person protests & failing to comply with conditions. Neil Parpworth continues his exploration of the proposed changes to the provisions in the Public Order Act 1986
  • Offences: knowingly failing to comply with conditions, properly communicated by police.
  • One-person protests: new statutory powers.

In the first part of this article, the focus of attention was on Pt 3 of the Police, Crime Sentencing and Courts Bill (PCSC Bill), in particular those provisions which seek to extend the statutory powers of the police under Part II of the Public Order Act 1986 in relation to a ‘public procession’ or a ‘public assembly’ (see ‘Crossing the (thin blue) line?’, NLJ 14 May 2021, p13). In the discussion which follows, two further impacts of Pt 3 of the Bill will be considered: how it proposes to alter the offences relating to the breach of a condition attached to either a procession or an assembly, and increase the penalties for their commission; and its conferral

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll