header-logo header-logo

16 February 2011
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Public procurement

Risk Management Partners Ltd v Brent London Borough Council and others [2011] UKSC 7, [2011] All ER (D) 103 (Feb)

The public procurement exemption set out in the decision of the European Court of Justice in Teckal SrL v Commune di Viano & Azienda Gas—Acqua Consorziale (AGAC) di Reggio Emilia [1999] ECR I-8121 (which provided that in certain circumstances, the award of a contract by one public body to another separate legal person would not fall within the definition of “public contract” in Council Directive (EC) 2004/18 on public procurement of goods, works and service, with the result that the Directive would not apply to it and the contract would not be required to be put out to tender) applied to the Public Contracts Regulations 2006, SI 2006/5. It was available in respect of contracts of insurance.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll