header-logo header-logo

16 July 2021 / Paul Henty
Issue: 7941 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Public
printer mail-detail

Public procurement post-Brexit: where are we now?

52827
What will be in a future Procurement Bill? Paul Henty explores the possibilities
  • Considers what might be included in a future Procurement Bill now EU Directives no longer apply.
  • The government wants to simplify UK procurement law and procedures, and add flexibility and innovation where possible.

Prior to the Brexit referendum in 2016, the Leave campaign identified public procurement as an area of EU-based law ripe for reform. They argued that ‘EU public procurement law imposes extremely onerous requirements on public authorities’. Public procurement is estimated to account for a staggering 13% of UK GDP.

In December 2020, the government published its green paper entitled ‘Transforming public procurement’. The paper coincided with the end of the transition period under the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement. It opened a consultation on proposed reform to the laws on public procurement now that the UK could unshackle itself from the EU Directives on Public Procurement.

While the government is officially still reviewing stakeholder feedback, the Queen’s Speech of 11 May appears

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll