header-logo header-logo

25 February 2010
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Publicity threat looms

Companies convicted of corporate manslaughter could be forced to advertise their conviction, under new government measures introduced this month.

Companies convicted of corporate manslaughter could be forced to advertise their conviction, under new government measures introduced this month.

The new regime means courts can now hand out Publicity Orders to firms and public bodies where gross corporate health and safety failures have caused a person’s death. Companies can already be hit with an unlimited fine or be forced to improve safety in the workplace. The orders could be used to compel companies to publicise details of the case, the fine imposed, and any remedial work they have undertaken. Local authorities, hospital trusts and police forces could be forced to inform residents about the conviction.

Gerard Forlin, barrister at 2–3 Gray’s Inn Square, says the intent is to deter companies from entering into behaviour that could lead to a prosecution in the first place. “This will have an impact because companies will worry about what their shareholders think, higher insurance premiums and difficulties with tendering for future work, although the newspaper reports would cover the large corporations anyway.

“The biggest impact will possibly be felt on smaller, more localised organisations where the publicity may not otherwise have been so widely disseminated,” he says.

Issue: 7406 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll