header-logo header-logo

Publicity threat looms

25 February 2010
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Companies convicted of corporate manslaughter could be forced to advertise their conviction, under new government measures introduced this month.

Companies convicted of corporate manslaughter could be forced to advertise their conviction, under new government measures introduced this month.

The new regime means courts can now hand out Publicity Orders to firms and public bodies where gross corporate health and safety failures have caused a person’s death. Companies can already be hit with an unlimited fine or be forced to improve safety in the workplace. The orders could be used to compel companies to publicise details of the case, the fine imposed, and any remedial work they have undertaken. Local authorities, hospital trusts and police forces could be forced to inform residents about the conviction.

Gerard Forlin, barrister at 2–3 Gray’s Inn Square, says the intent is to deter companies from entering into behaviour that could lead to a prosecution in the first place. “This will have an impact because companies will worry about what their shareholders think, higher insurance premiums and difficulties with tendering for future work, although the newspaper reports would cover the large corporations anyway.

“The biggest impact will possibly be felt on smaller, more localised organisations where the publicity may not otherwise have been so widely disseminated,” he says.

Issue: 7406 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll